Geoff,
I'm glad that it seems like we are talking in the same language. :)
-eunsook
On 6/20/07, Geoff Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was my understanding that while 6lowpan may consider "mesh under"
alternatives (layer 2 routing), it would rely upon a group like RSN to
deal with "route over" (layer 3 routing) and that 6lowpan would provide
requirements to RSN.
geoff
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
