> For now, RFC4919 takes the stance that L2 routing ("mesh") is an
> integral part of the 6lowpan requirements.First comment is that mesh is a networking protocol, not a data-link protocol. Thus, it cannot be an L2 "routing" requirement. Since IP is at L3, I agree with Kris--mesh can either be L2.5 (which is a bit weird IMHO), it can co-exist with IP (in an undefined way), or it can be leveraged above IP similar to overlays. -Joe _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
