In favor ! JP.
On 7/31/08 5:56 PM, "Carsten Bormann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lowpanners, > > we were so pressed for time at the WG meeting that the chairs forgot > to ask "the question": > > Do we believe that draft-hui-6lowpan-hc-01.txt is now ready to become > the WG document for charter item 2, "6LoWPAN Improved Header > Compression"? > > Note that moving the document to WG document status does not mean we > have to agree with every detail in there. > We just need to agree that it is a good basis for the remaining work. > (Moving to WG document status also means that all further changes > should be the result of work in the WG, so it also removes a little > flexibility that the authors of an individual draft have.) > I believe there was tacit agreement in the room in Dublin, and I now > want to make the agreement explicit on the mailing list. > > As the document has been pretty non-contentious, I'm looking forward > to comments until Monday 1800 UTC. > If there are no objections by this time, I'll ask Jonathan to resubmit > the draft as a WG document (possibly with the changes resulting from > this meeting). > > Gruesse, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
