So is this correct? Did Samita summarize the guidelines correctly.
What is the plan for the design team.
geoff
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 17:14 -0700, Samita Chakrabarti wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Since we are starting to work on the combined ND solution for 6lowpan,
> as one of the members of the ad-hoc ND team, I thought it would be
> very useful to verify our solution guidelines with the working group.
> I am starting with a few bullet points, please check if that meets our
> (6lowpan wg) requirements. Please feel free to suggest modification
> when it makes sense.
>
> ND Design goals:
>
>
> * Neighbor discovery using IPv6 ND protocol or its variant
> * The solution will use unicast/anycast messages to reduce mulitcast
> * The solution should look into minimizing number of total ND messages
> * Initial boot-strapping information and fault-tolerance should be
> addressed if possible
> * This solution must provide methods for IPv6 address allocation in
> 6lowpan nodes
> * Define a link that serves 6lowpan common deployment
> * The design should work with mesh-under(L2) and route-over(L3) routing
> * The design should be scalable for adding new nodes into the network
> * The solution should also keep in mind that 6lowpan is a low bW network
> * The ND design may not necessarily address mobility in boot-strapping
> and address assignment, but it may be extendable to address
> mobility in future.
> * The design will use IPv6 auto-configuration as the main method for
> address assignment; however stateful address configuration will also
> be considered
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Samita
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
