Hi,
We had a meeting today about this with all the authors. Based on the
feedback from the wg meeting, we will stick with Router Registration
(RR) as it is in -02. If we later start to form a consensus that this is
a problem, then let's take a look at it again after -03.
- Zach
Carsten Bormann wrote:
is this RR or RR
Receive Ready?
Route Request?
Resource Record?
Receiver Report?
It's little use to avoid *other protocols'* two-letter abbrevs.
I'd stick with RR.
Gruesse, Carsten
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
--
http://zachshelby.org - My blog “On the Internet of Things”
Mobile: +358 40 7796297
Zach Shelby
Head of Research
Sensinode Ltd.
Kidekuja 2
88610 Vuokatti, FINLAND
This e-mail and all attached material are confidential and may contain
legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and delete the e-mail from your system without
producing, distributing or retaining copies thereof.
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
