On Apr 8, 2009, at 8:06 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
AH, ESP and MH no?
Bit 4 does not have to be forced to 0 so we could actually support
these
by making the type 3 bits.
Jonathan, what do you think?
Sounds good to me. So maybe we should expand to the following:
0: Hop-by-Hop Options
1: Routing
2: Fragment
3: Destination Options
4: Encap Security Payload
5: Authentication Header
6: Mobility Header
7: Reserved
What about changing the meaning of the Length field in the
Authentication and Mobility headers? Authentication header is a bit
different since it specifies 4-octet units.
Do we have a good header for type 7? :-)
What do others think?
--
Jonathan Hui
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
