Looks ready to me.
Carsten, could you clarify how you want to handle RFC4944 ? Do you
want to have this one updating RFC4944 ?
Thanks.
JP.
On Oct 5, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Oct 5, 2009, at 17:02, Jonathan Hui wrote:
Please send comments.
Let me expand that:
I haven't done a detailed review, but from the first look it appears
to me this might now be ready for working-group last call.
Those of you reviewing this -- if you find any show-stoppers or
don't agree this is ready for WGLC, please tell the list until
Friday, which might be a good day to issue the WGLC otherwise*).
Gruesse, Carsten
*) (Of course, if you find show-stoppers afterwards, or have any
other comments, they would go into the WGLC comments.)
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
