On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 14:09 +0300, Zach Shelby wrote:
> What you are proposing is that we don't do AR, and only optimize for
> the host-router relationship. Of course host-to-host connectivity is
> not prevented, you can contact any node within radio range using its
> link-local address.
>
> [Editor hat off]
> Personally, I agree with your approach, this is all that is needed
> in
> real applications I have seen so far. I also agree any more general
> AR
> mechanisms should be left for more general future work. This is
> optimization at its best - if you don't need it - leave it out.
> [Editor hat on]
I am really concerned about statement. I have seen plenty of real
applications that require P2P and not just host to router
communications.
If AR is required for P2P then we cannot leave it out.
geoff
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
