On Nov 9, 2009, at 19:35, Samita Chakrabarti wrote:
1.Document refers to "Classic ND" which brings up some questions in mind - should not it be "Standard ND" ?
No. Both 6lowpan-ND and RFC 4861 will be standards-track, so "Standard ND" is ambiguous.
Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
