JP,
I'm not sure what we are going to have the discussion around. We did
a last call on the document and from my review of the mailing list there
was clear consensus that the document was complete and should be sent on
to the IESG.
I don't know what we would discuss?
geoff
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 18:54 +0100, JP Vasseur wrote:
> Geoff, should we try to have a discussion ?
>
> On Nov 9, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>
> > On Nov 9, 2009, at 20:42, JP Vasseur wrote:
> >
> >> How do you propose to close on the disagreement that we have on the
> >> routing requirement ID ?
> >
> > 1) Since I honestly don't understand where that disagreement is, I
> > don't think we can resolve it.
> >
> > 2) Since I'm a co-author, I have to recuse myself from acting as a
> > WG chair in this matter, so I'll defer to Geoff on this.
> >
> > Gruesse, Carsten
> >
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
