As a newcomer to IPv6 and ND, I am having trouble following
the "4861 works"/"no it doesn't" debate. The ND draft lays
out the reasons why its authors think that 4861 is unsuitable
for low-power/lossy networks. Clearly, some folks disagree.
Is there anything that explains where the authors of the ND
draft went wrong? Are there descriptions of how 4861 has
been used in this sort of network? I understand the
downsides to not using 4861, but if it won't work, what
choice do we have but to use something else?
-Richard Kelsey
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
