On Feb 22, 2010, at 14:34, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote: > I do agree with you, and with the model that you mentioned > before, that is that the 6LoWPAN compression should be a sublayer above > the fragment sublayer as opposed to be weirdly intertwined.
I think a previous message nicely listed the advantages and disadvantages of the usual layering vs. the weird one (compress a single fragment) we adopted in 4944. But in any case, 4944 fragmentation also works with HC-new, so any new layering would only apply to a new fragmentation format, if we invent one. Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
