Hello,

> I don't think anything is technically broken if we leave 
> Section 6 of RFC 4944 as is.  

True, as people almost always know their PAN-ID. We were seeing it as a
question & interoperability problem though - some people used 0x0000 here,
some people used a PAN-ID here. And Zach mentions some people using 0xFFFF.

> My suggestion would be to create a new section that updates 
> Section 6 of RFC 4944 and point the text to that section.

Works for me! I don't have strong feelings about if it should be PAN-ID or
0x0000 or anything else, but again I think it's critical one is picked
(ideally adding to hc-06 before WGLC).

0x0000 has the advantage of being easy, and avoids any possible U/L
problems. If you use PAN-ID, there will always be two PAN-IDs mapping to the
same IP address (as the U/L bit is cleared).

Using the PAN-ID has the advantage that we are not actually changing
anything about RFC4944, just optimizing out a conditional statement that
always evaluates to false. 

Regards,

  -Colin

-----Original Message-----
From: Zach Shelby [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: March 5, 2010 5:53 PM
To: Richard Kelsey
Cc: Colin O'Flynn; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] 6lowpan 16-bit PAN-ID Field


On Mar 5, 2010, at 16:39 , Richard Kelsey wrote:

> In a lowpan With only a single PAN ID it makes much more
> sense to use zeros and avoid problems if the PAN ID has to
> change.

+1. 

Or it can also be 0xFFFF (broadcast) which then allows a 16-bit MAC address
of 0. This is what most people are doing in practice from what I've seen.
Wouldn't hurt to have a recommendation like that in HC...

Zach

-- 
http://www.sensinode.com
http://zachshelby.org - My blog "On the Internet of Things"
http://6lowpan.net - New book - "6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet"
Mobile: +358 40 7796297

Zach Shelby
Head of Research
Sensinode Ltd.
Kidekuja 2
88610 Vuokatti, FINLAND

This e-mail and all attached material are confidential and may contain
legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and delete the e-mail from your system without
producing, distributing or retaining copies thereof. 





_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to