Hi Carsten and Geoff,

 

We had an interesting discussion today in Anaheim on 6LoWPAN Neighbor
Discovery (ND).  As you know this has been a longstanding open item.

 

We have some specific deadlines for the Smart Energy work.  Specifically, we
need resolution on the ND topic (with a final I-D generally agreed by the
WG) within a 2 month timeframe.  If we cannot achieve this in 6LoWPAN, then
our commercial alliance will need to create a commercial specification
around whatever is available and we believe could later map to an agreed
solution.  This is not optimal but in reality we simply cannot wait any
longer for closure on ND.

 

Could we ask for at least a finite decision on what exact parts of ND-08 or
ND-simple will be part of the next round of ND drafts?  Could we ask for an
expedited process in resolving this somehow?  Is there a way we could
contribute to the ND resolution through our interoperability testing for
Smart Energy if we end up moving forward before WG consensus?  

 

What I think we need is a schedule and some work assignments that would lead
to resolution on this topic.   There are several members of our group who
would be willing to contribute if there is a plan in place to close this
issue quickly.

 

Thanks,

 

Don Sturek

Chair, ZigBee Alliance Core Stack Working Group (representing ZigBee IP)

 

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to