Hi All, According to the current 6lowpan-nd draft, I have one question.
The draft mentioned NS must include SLLA option in order to inform the link-layer address of the host. However when the router receives RS message from the host, the router responds RA to the host. At that time, the router needs to know the link-layer address of the host in order to send out RA to the host. So, I think SLLA option of the host must be included in RS instead of NS. According to the current ND draft, after receiving RS message, the router sends NS message in order to solve the link layer address of the host by using solicited node multicast address. In order to eliminate the multicast packet as much as possible, I recommend to include SLLA option in RS instead of NS. Thanks, Tetsuya Murakami _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
