#68: SLLA Option in RS and NS messages
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: z...@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: format | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Tetsuya and Joseph brought up an issue on the list to clarify the
inclusion of the SLLA Option in RS and NS messages and the point at which
a Neighbor Cache entry is made. The following clarfications are planned:
- The SLLA Option MUST be included in both RS and NS messages.
- The RA must use the SLLA option in the RS without creating a Neighbor
Cache entry, because we don't want to add a Neighbor Cache entry until we
get an ARO from the host.
- Clarify that an unspecified source address is never used for a NS.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/trac/ticket/68>
6lowpan <http://tools.ietf.org/6lowpan/>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
