#110: IESG comment #19 (by Adrian Farrel) - "SHOULD NOT" term in R11
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: carle...@… | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: routing-requirements | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Requirement 11 says
[R11] The procedure of route repair and related control messages
should not harm overall energy consumption from the routing
protocols.
Why don't you use "SHOULD NOT"?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/trac/ticket/110>
6lowpan <http://tools.ietf.org/6lowpan/>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
