#78: Improve R12
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: dokaspar.i...@… | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: routing-requirements | Version:
Severity: Active WG Document | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Changes (by c...@…):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
The difference between intra- and inter-LoWPAN mobility, as well as the
causes for this mobility are now called out more explicitly in R12
(SVN-196).
The authors do not know a way to derive characteristic MTBF value(s) that
would be meaningful for
routing protocol development.
(Original comment was from Routing Directorate Review of draft-ietf-
6lowpan-routing-
requirements-06.txt, May 20, 2010)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/trac/ticket/78#comment:1>
6lowpan <http://tools.ietf.org/6lowpan/>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
