Happy to help.
On Jul 25, 2010, at 11:16 PM, 6lowpan issue tracker wrote:
#91: Clarification on routing protocol interaction
--------------------------------
+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: z...@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: trivial | Milestone:
Component: nd | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
--------------------------------
+-------------------------------------------
There has been discussion on the list regarding how to apply 6lowpan-
nd
between routers, particularly with RPL but this is a general issue
as ND
is routing protocol agnostic.
The main confusion comes from when NS/NA with ARO should be used by a
router, and how neighbor cache entries and default router entries
can be
maintained by a routing algorithm. This ticket is to include further
clarifications and recommendations.
Note: ND is agnostic to the use of routing algorithms, and it the
decision
of the routing algorithm or implementor as to which ND mechanisms
are used
between routers. This follows the practice introduced with RFC4861.
--
Ticket URL: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/trac/ticket/91>
6lowpan <http://tools.ietf.org/6lowpan/>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
