On Jul 29, 2010, at 09:45, Erik Nordmark wrote:

> Is 64 a reasonable upper limit on the diameter for a 6lowpan?

These will be sent by routers which should have a reasonable idea of the 
network diameter.
No need to fix this in the spec, I believe.

Gruesse, Carsten

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to