I have reviewed the HC-08 draft and think it is ready to go to the IESG
However the known problem regarding compression of headers which fit only in the first fragment, described in section 2 should be retained as a work item within the WG in order to arrive at a solution which does not suffer from this restriction
Paul



Carsten Bormann wrote:
LoWPANners,

on Monday we discussed HC-07 and said we should issue a final short
working-group last call based on the outcome of the previous WGLC of
HC-06 as reflected in HC-07 plus a small clarification to that.
Jonathan went ahead and submitted a fixed HC-08 right during the
meeting!

This is now a Working-Group Last-Call for:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-08

The document is intended to be submitted by this Working Group to the
IESG for publication as a Standards-Track Document.  Note that the
document updates RFC 4944: please pay careful attention to section 2
(this approach is not a change to the previous WGLC, though).

This is a one-week Working-Group Last-Call, ending on 2010-08-09
(Monday, August 09, 2010) at 2359 UTC.

Please review the document carefully (one last time), and send your
comments to the 6lowpan list.  Please also indicate in your response
whether or not you think this document is ready to go to the IESG.

Carsten and Geoff

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

--

____________________________________________
Paul Chilton, Head of Software Innovation
Low Power RF Solutions (formerly Jennic Ltd)
NXP Semiconductors NV
Furnival Street, Sheffield, S1 4QT, UK
Tel: +44 114 281 2655
Fax: +44 114 281 2951
Comp Reg No: 3191371   Registered In England
http://www.nxp.com     http://www.jennic.com
____________________________________________
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to