Hi Jonathan I have a question on recent text changes in the HC draft
If I look at the text in 3.1.1 for the SAM=10 case, the text is different depending on whether SAC=0 or SAC=1. The SAC=0 explicitly calls out how to create the trailing 64bits while the SAC=1 does not ( I think the draft intends that the text in 3.2.2 should apply in this case but that is slightly confusing as that text refers to 16bit link layer address and not the inline fields ) Can you confirm that the actual behaviour ( i.e., how the 64 trailing bits are constructed ) is the same is both cases and the text difference is only editorial ? Would it make it clearer if the SAC=1 case has the similar text as SAC=0 ( "... 64 bits are 0000:00ff:fe00:XXXX, where XXXX are the 16 bits carried in-line." ). Same for destination addresses.. -Regards, Joseph _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
