Yes. I also agree with Yoav. Thanks, - Jongsoo
2010/10/7 Yoav Ben-Yehezkel <[email protected]> > I think improving the text to make this clearer would be useful. > > Thanks, > Yoav > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Carsten Bormann > Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:02 AM > To: Jongsoo Jeong > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Don't 6LRs need to register their addresses to > 6LBR? > > On Oct 7, 2010, at 08:29, Jongsoo Jeong wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > I have a question with 6lowpan-nd. > > In the 'Section 10.3.1. Bootstrapping a Router', A sentence "Initially > R1 behaves as a host." makes me confused. Does it means that 6LRs must > register their address? > > 6LoWPAN-ND does not take a position. > > It offers a way to do address validation for all nodes (hosts and > routers). > If you have another way to get addresses for routers (e.g., > pre-configuration, some form of management protocol such as ISA SP100, > DHCPv6), 6LoWPAN-ND does not force you to use its mechanisms. > > > If it does, do they have to register their address periodically after > they started a routing protocol? Otherwise, how can 6lowpan-nd prevent > collisions of 6LRs' addresses? > > If you do use the 6LoWPAN-ND mechanisms, then you indeed need to keep the > registration fresh. > > Do you think we could improve the text to make this clearer? > > Gruesse, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan >
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
