On Oct 13, 2010, at 14:30, Daniel Gavelle wrote: > These problems could be addressed by setting the hop limit to a more typical > value, e.g. 64, for the multi-hop messages.
Sounds good to me. Multihop messages between 6LR and 6LBR definitely don't need the HL=255 trick, so the nodes should be free to choose a hop limit that is appropriate for the network they are in. I don't think we want to hardwire a suggestion for the 'hop limit' value in the draft (although a number around 64 sounds like a good implementation default). Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
