Hi Carsten, Now we have LWIP which will on similar issues. In view of that I am not sure if this is still needed.
Regards, Behcet > > 6LoWPANners, > > the 6LoWPAN WG has been chartered to produce an "implementers guide", >collecting clarifying information about the standards relevant for this WG. >So >far there has been little need for this, as we have put the necessary >clarifying information into the specs themselves. However, with these >maturing, >maybe it is time to start work on the implementers guide. > > I have submitted a first version of a document that might be fleshed out > over >time to become that implementers guide. > I expect this to grow, but probably not to the size of its role model, RFC >4815. > > Please find it at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-6lowpan-roadmap-00 > > Enjoy! > > Gruesse, Carsten > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <[email protected]> > > Date: March 7, 2011 20:16:52 +0100 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bormann-6lowpan-roadmap-00 > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-bormann-6lowpan-roadmap-00.txt has been >successfully submitted by Carsten Bormann and posted to the IETF repository. > > > > Filename: draft-bormann-6lowpan-roadmap > > Revision: 00 > > Title: 6LoWPAN Roadmap and Implementation Guide > > Creation_date: 2011-03-07 > > WG ID: Independent Submission > > Number_of_pages: 12 > > > > Abstract: > > 6LoWPAN is defined in RFC 4944 in conjunction with a number of > > specifications that are currently nearing completion. The entirety > > of these specifications may be hard to understand, pose specific > > implementation problems, or be simply inconsistent. > > > > The present guide aims to provide a roadmap to these documents as > > well as provide specific advice how to use these specifications in > > combination. In certain cases, it may provide clarifications or even > > corrections to the specifications referenced. > > > > This guide is intended as a continued work-in-progress, i.e. a long- > > lived Internet-Draft, to be updated whenever new information becomes > > available and new consensus on how to handle issues is formed. > > Similar to the ROHC implementation guide, RFC 4815, it might be > > published as an RFC at some future time later in the acceptance curve > > of the specifications. > > > > This document does not describe a new protocol or attempts to set a > > new standard of any kind -- it mostly describes good practice in > > using the existing specifications, but it may also document emerging > > consensus where a correction needs to be made. > > > > The current version -00 of this document is just an initial draft > > that is intended to spark the collection of relevant information. > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
