Hi all, This is just a question rather than a comment since the WGLC period is already over and a matter is really old one. I thought the old draft (before 08 or 07) has a concept of a conjunction of the mesh under and the route over. However, it looks to me the current draft implicit that there isn't a concept like that anymore. (Ex. Route over runs among LRs and each LR has mesh under network individually.)
Am I missing something? Or the document still allows it? Apologize if the WG already has a consent regarding this. --- OKI Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Noriyuki Sato ([email protected]) Tel +81-6-6260-0700 Fax +81-6-6260-0770 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:58 AM To: 6lowpan Subject: [6lowpan] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-15 In September/October, we had the first WGLC on 6LoWPAN-ND, which resulted in a number of detailed comments and two resulting fine-tuning iterations of the draft. draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-15.txt has been out for two months now. I understand it has taken part in several interops with multiple implementations in this period; no issues came up. We now start the Working Group Last Call on: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-15 The document is planned to be submitted by this Working Group to the IESG for publication as a Standards-Track Document. This is a two-week Working-Group Last-Call, ending on Thursday, 2011-03-03 at 2359 UTC. Please review the changes to the document carefully once more, and send your comments to the 6lowpan list. Please also do indicate to the list if you are all-OK with the document. Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
