On 25/03/2011 20:12, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Mathieu Goessens wrote: > > >> Hi folks, >> >> The RFC4944 looks to be different in the version distributed by >> tools.ietf.org and datatracker.ietf.org / rfc-editor.org. >> >> The figure 2 looks truncated on the tools.ietf.org version: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt >> >> Do you know what is the problem ? Document generation problem ? Where it >> should be reported ? >> > > These two documents were clearly derived from very different sources: the > page breaks are also quite different. > > How on earth did that happen I am not that sure: the page break is different precisely starting from this figure.
I was more thinking about a different version of configuration of the xml2rfc software. Regards, -- Mathieu Goessens IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France Tel: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 00, Fax: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 71 _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
