On 6/14/11 1:44 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Zach,
Thanks for this new version.
I still have a comment about section 5.3.
In this section one can read that the RS must (actually there is no MUST,
SHOULD, MAY in the text) be sent to the IPv6 All-Routers multicast address
and the destination link-layer address may be some kind of all-routers
anycast link-layer address.
However in section 10.2 the 2nd element of the list says that the RS can
be sent unicast to the router with its link-local IPv6 address.
Don't you think that section 5.3 should mention the possibility to send a
unicast RS in addition to the example provided in section 10.2?
A unicast RS is allowed in RFC 4861, so I think what you are proposing
is just an editorial change to make the options clearer to those who
haven't digested RFC 4861. Is my understanding correct?
Erik
Best regards,
Matthieu
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
