On Jul 22, 2011, at 19:59, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> It seems that "IEEE 802.15.4-based Networks" made the consensus.
Sorry, Pascal, not so fast.
It is a bit hard to diagnose a consensus here, except that
the clear WG consensus seems to be that nobody cares much :-)
It is indeed pretty clear from the extended WG discussion that
Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-based Networks
or
Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-based Networks
is the important part of the title.
We don't seem to have full consensus on whether 6LoWPAN should be part of the
title.
Jonathan would like to keep it out, others have indicated that they think it
should be part of the title (as it was during WGLC and IETF last call).
Megan has indicated that 6LoWPAN would be expanded as in RFC 4919:
IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs):
I think the best of both worlds would be
Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-based Networks
(6LoWPANs)
but I'd need input from the RFC editor whether that can be done without falling
into the expansion trap.
Gruesse, Carsten
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
