Hi Carsten I think the context reference (for common IPv6 prefix) is very useful and should be a part of the main set of rules. On the other hand, I am not sure how useful the back reference facility is going to be.
Thanks Mukul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carsten Bormann" <[email protected]> To: "6lowpan" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Monday, October 3, 2011 4:18:19 PM Subject: [Roll] GHC draft, version -03 LoWPANners, ROLLers, I have updated the 6LoWPAN generic header compression (GHC) draft along what I perceive to be the results of discussions so far: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-6lowpan-ghc-03 I have moved nibblecode and context references to an appendix, with the intention of removing them unless we do agree one or both of them should stay in. I have also moved the extensive examples to an appendix to reduce the bulk of the main body. Apart from removing nibblecode and context references, I haven't actually changed anything on the wire, so if you have code, that should still be interoperable. I would love to receive comments in time to allow me an update before the Taipei cutoff (Nov 1), so we can discuss a -04 version there in the hallways (and possibly in or around the ROLL meeting). Ceterum censeo: please keep the packet dumps (pcaps) coming… (Please reply to the 6lowpan mailing list only, unless there is a ROLL-specific issue.) Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ Roll mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
