Folks, The GHC draft has been around for quite some time, and seems like a good general solution for increasing the efficiency of ICMPv6, routing (RPL...) and other headers. For example in the ROLL meeting today concern over the fragmentation of messages was expressed. Could we consider making this a working group document? Do people think this would be a solid starting point for solving this problem, and is there interest to work on, implement and use it? I personally do think it would be useful.
Zach On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > I have updated the GHC draft. > There is no technical change that would affect interoperability; I have > mainly clarified what the (remaining 47 bits in the) 6CIO option also could > be used for. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-6lowpan-ghc-04 > > I think this specification is now ready for use and would like to hear from > implementors. > > Grüße, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan -- Zach Shelby, Chief Nerd, Sensinode Ltd. http://www.sensinode.com http://zachshelby.org - My blog "On the Internet of Things" http://6lowpan.net - My book "6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet" Mobile: +358 40 7796297 _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
