Hi Carsten, and All, >+1, but I thought the 6LP working group was closed !
were there an announcement for close in the discussion list? I didn't find it ! were there a good reason for such close? no clue ! >The 6LoWPAN WG is alive and well and is in the process of closing > its remaining two work items (6LoWPAN-ND, 6LoWPAN for BTLE). >However, you are right in that the 6LoWPAN WG no longer takes new work on. I don't know how the WG will not take new items while it is still working. The IETF WGs are alive only when they have both input and output. If a WG only has output then in some day it will be closed, but if a WG has input without output that means it is not performing well ;) >The chairs, with the ADs and the chairs of other WGs, will ensure that interesting work finds an appropriate home. Yes it is ok to organise where items go, but why blocking items to come in this WG. I thought it was the decision of the WG to decide if they take in new items or not, not others. IMHO, the chairs organise/guide the process and WG makes decisions. Please advise, because I don't understand your input even after reading the IETF procedures and best practices, Regards AB =========================================== On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 14, 2012, at 09:31, Laurent Toutain wrote: > > > but I thought the 6LP working group was closed > > ...>>>>>... > Changing to WG chair mode for a moment: > > The 6LoWPAN WG is alive and well and is in the process of closing its > remaining two work items (6LoWPAN-ND, 6LoWPAN for BTLE). > > However, you are right in that the 6LoWPAN WG no longer takes new work on. > The chairs, with the ADs and the chairs of other WGs, will ensure that > interesting work finds an appropriate home. > > Indicating whether you are interested in GHC is therefore important input. > > Another comment: > Beyond the +1s, it would be useful to know, whether you (I'm addressing > the WG here) would be interested in > > -- reviewing versions of the draft as they progress > -- implementing the draft and relaying feedback. > > ...<<<<<... > I'm back to personal contributor mode now. > > (Luckily, we won't have this hat-changing going on any more when we find > the new home.) > > I'm just in the process of receiving some more packet captures. > I would like to take this opportunity to remind people that the more > packet captures we have to look at, the better we will be able to optimize > this scheme before nailing it down. > > A collection of packets I looked at is in > > http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/6lowpan/packets > > (and, of course, there is the discussion of these in the draft itself). > > Grüße, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan >
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
