Hello, I am just thinking that a new Milestone or Goal would be: 802.15.7 (Li-Fi) + 6lowPAN.
What do you think about it? Thanks and Regards, Ines Robles. > Hi Carsten, > > I agree that it was good to complete the tasks and solve the specific > issues, and it may be a good reason for close, but I also think the working > group can decide if they want to bring more tasks in and continue (I don't > see a role in IETF to MUST close WG if completes the specific problems, > if I am wrong please refer me to a page reference?), and if they want to > solve other problems related to the group purpose. I think that the > community drives works/inputs in IETF WGs. > > IMO, the IESG is only to decide to requests of open or close, after they > get an input with reason. I don't think they are prerogative to decide the > input and decide the output as well. IMO IESG are prerogative to decide the > outcome. The inputs are decided by the WG, and the WG may not decide the > outcome-result of such input. So I think if we want to request for > continue/close we see the community input for 6Lowpan WG, then if they > wanted to continue we input to IESG for their approval, if they want to > close then it will be without an input request. > > There is a possibility that I don't know how the IETF works, but I read the > IETF procedures, and see that there is no good reason for close without the > WG consensus or input of this issue. > > Regards > >
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
