Carsten, all, On 10/29/2012 04:56 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On Oct 29, 2012, at 17:49, QIU Ying <[email protected]> wrote: > >> which WG is best > > I think right now we don't know that. > All WGs in the CN/N cluster have the problem and have some unfulfilled > charter item in this space. > So we can continue to play tourists and use the WG that happens to have the > largest amount of space on the agenda... > > In SOLACE, we are discussing right now when to meet during the Atlanta IETF.
Would it be timely to spend 10 minutes on this during the saag session? I'd really like that the security area not end up being surprised by whatever is eventually decided so getting a presentation at saag would be useful at the point where you more or less know the direction, but are still flexible enough to deal with someone who e.g. points out significant security issues. It might be that waiting another meeting cycle or two would be better if the basic ideas aren't yet firmed up. So, is this work far enough advanced already for that to be productive now or is it still so early it'd be counter-productive? (And presenting at saag before you're ready could very well be counter-productive - it can be a tough audience;-) Ta, S. > It looks like we will meet on Sunday before the reception for some > brainstorming and maybe on Monday during lunchtime for getting organized. > If you are interested, please join the SOLACE mailing list: > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/admin/solace > > Grüße, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > Roll mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll > > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
