+1.

Anand



> On 11-May-2015, at 11:13 am, Tengfei Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1. I agree with description of the text.
> 
> Tengfei
> 
>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Xavier Vilajosana 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> after the last call we would like to close the security section in minimal. 
>> We wrapped up all comments from the previous days and from the meeting and 
>> here is our proposal:
>> 
>> This draft assumes the existence of two cryptographic keys, K1 and
>> K2.  EBs SHOULD be authenticated with key K1.  DATA, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, and 
>> MAC COMMAND frame types SHOULD be authenticated and encrypted with key K2.  
>> For early interoperability, K1 MAY be set to "6TiSCH minimal15".  K2 SHOULD 
>> be a randomly generated high entropy cryptographic key.  Key distribution is 
>> out of scope.
>> 
>> I would like to encourage everybody to see if this texts covers all what we 
>> want for minimal, and provide consensus. We need to move forward. 
>> 
>> kind regards,
>> Xavi
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6tisch mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean.
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to