I think 6tisch should continue its own security-related work and *not*
shift this to someone else's plate. Obviously, this does not preclude
taking advantage of intelligent ideas that may originate elsewhere and
see whether these have some value for us. Please note that "elsewhere"
is certainly not limited to Anima or IETF (there are lots of
"intelligent life forms" outside IETF).
Rene
On 5/22/2015 12:12 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
Dear all :
Following up after the interim today:
For the sake of proposing an item for the next charter, we need to
specify how much we overlap with ANIMA and how we’ll proceed to cover
that overlap.
ANIMA will be the place where the autonomic bootstrap will be defined.
They will have an eye to try and maintain applicability to IoT but
that is not a constraint in the charter.
OTOH, everything specific to 6TiSCH (e.g. discussions that involve MAC
message and operations) and that does not involve autonomic /
certificate-based operation as ANIMA will focus on must also be
handled at home.
Suggestions?
Pascal
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
--
email: [email protected] | Skype: rstruik
cell: +1 (647) 867-5658 | US: +1 (415) 690-7363
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
