Hi Xavi, Kris, all,
reading RFC 6550, I find:
1. page 70:
A DODAG root MUST advertise a Rank of ROOT_RANK.
2. page 112:
ROOT_RANK: This is the Rank for a DODAG root. ROOT_RANK has a value
of MinHopRankIncrease (as advertised by the DODAG root), such
that DAGRank(ROOT_RANK) is 1.
So that the example in section 9.1.2 of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-06 seems
not compliant with RFC 6550 (unless node 0 is a virtual DODAG root).
Am I missing something?
Sincerely,
Nicola
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
