Jose,
Thanks a million for your e-mail. I will forward it to the
plugtest-specific ML.
Thomas

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:29 AM, José Ángel Miranda <[email protected]>
wrote:

> We found some doubts when reading the DIO message sent by the DODAG Root
> from the current GD version:
>
> *1. * The DIO message is encoded with the IPv6 in IPv6 tunneling header.
> Is it necessary ?
>
> The minimal-10 draft at section 9.2 states:  " ... In the case that the
> packets formed at the LLN need to cross through intermediate routers,
> these MUST obey to the IP in IP encapsulation requirement... " ; since DIO
> messages do not cross any router, but are sent hop by hop by every RPL
> routing node why do we need to encapsulate them with this additional header
> and " waste " more than 30 bytes of payload in a low power application like
> WSN ?
>
> *2*. The DIO Base byte number 5  ( G | 0 | MOP | Prf ) is seto to " 0xB8
> " ; this means  G = 1 , MOP = 7 , Prf = 0 ( this bug has been already
> detected by 6TiSCH ).
>
> The RPL Standard at section 6.3.1 defines as assigned modes of operation
> only numbers 0 to 3, so MOP = 7 is not admitted by the standard, thus a
> node that receives such DIO message will certainly discard it since this
> mode of operation is a non-standard one.
>
> * 3*. The DIO message comes without any DIO Option and advertises a rank
> of "0x0000" in bytes 3 and 4 of the DIO base.
>
> The RPL standard at section 8.2.2.2 says  " ...  A DODAG root MUST
> advertise a Rank of ROOT_RANK  ... " , and defines ROOT_RANK at point 17 as
> "... This is the Rank for a DODAG root. ROOT_RANK has a value of
> MinHopRankIncrease (as advertised by the DODAG root)   ... " . The
> minimal-10 draft at section 9.1.1 states:
>
> "... MinHopRankIncrease: the MinHopRankIncrease is set to the fixed
> constant DEFAULT_MIN_HOP_rank_increment [RFC6550].
> DEFAULT_MIN_HOP_rank_increment has a value of 256. "
>
> Given that, shouldn't the rank of the DIO message be equal to
> MinHopRankIncrease instead than zero ?  Moreover, don't you find
>  convenient to insert the  " DODAG configuration option" in the DIO
> message, in order to let nodes know how the DODAG works and be configured
> accordingly ?
>
> You can find attached a screenshot from the DR's DIO message reception.
>
> ------------------------------------------
> *Jose A. Miranda Calero*
>
> Embedded Software Engineer
>
> Kirale Technologies S.L.
> Logroño - Spain
>
> tel:    +34941578578
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>
>
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to