Hello Ralph > The recommendation for the document as a whole is to focus on a mid-level > architecture, and publish detailed descriptions of device operation and > protocol specifications in separate documents.
<Pascal> Point taken, we'll have 15 minutes at 6TiSCH on Tuesday 1PM. Will you be with us? </Pascal> > So 6tisch is proceeding with the design decisions without the DetNet > architecture in place? I will take another look at draft-ietf-6tisch- > architecture to see if the split and dependencies between 6tisch and DetNet > are well-described. <Pascal> There is more in draft-thubert-6tisch-4detnet; maybe we can retrofit some of that if you find that Archie is lacking in that regard. </Pascal> > In my opinion, I think the document should describe what security services > will be expected from various layers, and how those security services > interact. Operational details should be published in a separate > specification. > > I realize I haven't asked your question directly...of course, the document > needs a section on the security architecture. My recommendations would > be to have a separate section, title "Security Architecture", which describes > the entire security architecture, which includes the functional requirements > and services of the join procedure as one component. > Points taken as well. We have security authors in the document. Thanks for all! Pascal _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
