Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> wrote: >> Do we? Are we using ND for 6CO exchange?
> Not yet, and minimal does not specify that since it does not change it
> from the behavior of a 6LoWPAN node. The architecture sh/could.
>> Do we support ND-only nodes that don't speak RPL, 6top or minimal?
> The architecture does mention that as a goal, but we are missing the
> work at ROLL and 6lo.
> This is exactly where minimal reuses whatever is in the environment for
> that, the environment being the current state of 6LoWPAN on normal
> 802.15.4.
> Do you mean that we should be explicit in saying the a minimal node
> must support at least 6LoWPAN RFCs xxxx?
I'm saying that an IP-over-FOO(802.15.4e) should probably say these things.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
