Great to hear that! Talk to you on the call! Tengfei
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) < [email protected]> wrote: > You’re correct TengFei, thanks for catching this! > > > > This table is an edition leftover. Please ignore it, it will be removed. > > > > Take care, > > > > Pascal > > > > *From:* 6lo [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Tengfei Chang > *Sent:* jeudi 7 janvier 2016 21:02 > *To:* [email protected]; [email protected] > *Subject:* [6lo] Types of RPI 6LoRH > > > > Dear all, > > > > I have a question about the types of RPI 6LoRH. Please let me know if this > is a duplicate question. > > > > In the draft: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-00 > > From figure 9 to figure 12 starting from page 13, it shows different > combination of I and K in RPI 6LoRH and the Type is set to 5. > > > > In figure 13 (see below), there are 4 types value in RPI-6LoRH to indicate > the different value of I and K. > > > > +-----------+-------+-------+ > > | Type | I | K | > > +-----------+-------+-------+ > > | 5 | 0 | 0 | > > | 6 | 0 | 1 | > > | 7 | 1 | 0 | > > | 8 | 1 | 1 | > > +-----------+-------+-------+ > > > > This confused me that which is the used to identify the value of I and K. > I guess we still use the bit I and K itself and use type 5 to indicate RPI > 6LoRH . If so, I don't understand the use cases of other value of types. > > > > Maybe I misunderstand something, please correct me if I did. Thanks! > > > > Tengfei >
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
