Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-6tisch-01-00: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-6tisch/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Not a block, but I would like to discuss the "OPS" situation in the charter/WG. Looking at this paragraph: - Produce an Information Model containing the management requirements of a 6TiSCH node. This includes describing how an entity can manage the TSCH schedule on a 6TiSCH node, and query timeslot information from that node. A data model mapping for an existing protocol (such as Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) over the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)) will be provided. This work depends on the standardization of a method to access management data resources in constrained devices, such as proposed by CoMI or COOL. I wonder if this paragraph is still accurate? There is this WG document, for a YANG data model, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-interface-04, on which I commented during one of the interim call. So the YANG model should be specifically mentioned. Also, will the WG still produce an information model? If not, "information model" should be removed _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
