Hi Pascal and All,

I have read this I-D. I support to adopt it as the working group draft if it 
addresses the following comment:

~~~ Beginning of Comment ~~~
In 6TiSCH architecture and terminology working group documents, the concept of 
?Bundle? has been proposed to represent a link between nodes.

For example, in the architecture I-D: ?With 6TiSCH, the link abstraction is 
implemented as a bundle of cells; the size of a bundle is optimal when both the 
energy wasted idle listening and the packet drops due to congestion loss are 
minimized.  This can be maintained if the number of cells in a bundle is 
adapted dynamically, and with enough reactivity, to match the variations of 
best-effort traffic.?

In the terminology I-D: ?A bundle represents a half-duplex link between nodes, 
one  transmitter and one or more receivers, with a bandwidth that amount to the 
sum of the cells in the bundle.  A bundle is globally identified by (source 
MAC, destination MAC, TrackID).  At Layer 3 a pair of bundles forms a link.  By 
usining a well-known constant, NULLT, as TrackId for a L3 link, the IP link 
between adjacent nodes A and B comprises 2 bundles: (macA, macB, NULLT) and 
(macB, macA, NULLT).?

Therefore, since 6top I-D aims to enable distributed scheduling, I suggest that 
the 6top protocol should support ?Bundle? as defined in the architecture and 
terminology I-Ds; For example, to contain the bundle information in 6P messages 
in Section 4.2.
~~~ End of Comment ~~~

-----Original Message-----
From: 6tisch [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert 
(pthubert)
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 12:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [6tisch] Call for adoption for draft-wang-6tisch-6top-protocol-00

Dear All:

Following up on the rough consensus at the 6TiSCH WG meeting at IETF 95:
This is a call for adoption of draft-wang-6tisch-6top-protocol-00 which details 
the 6P protocol and proposes a solution for a chartered item.
Please respond by Friday to this mail indicating whether you agree or not with 
this adoption, and preferably provide some rationale to support your position.
The chairs will evaluate the consensus at the interim, and decide whether the 
adoption is confirmed or the call needs to be prolonged.

Thanks un advance!

The chairs,

Pascal

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to