Hi all,
I support adoption of SF0 draft.
Anand
On Monday 18 April 2016 08:08 PM, Kris Pister wrote:
+1
ksjp
On 4/18/2016 3:08 AM, Xavier Vilajosana wrote:
Dear all,
I am in favour of the adoption of SF0 draft. We need a policy to
manage the allocation of cells using 6p. SF0 evolved from OTF after
several month of discussion and now is meeting our needs, being both
simple and powerful to allocate cells in a distributed manner.
kind regards,
Xavi
2016-04-18 6:22 GMT+02:00 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]>:
Dear All:
Following up on the rough consensus at the 6TiSCH WG meeting at
IETF 95:
This is a call for adoption of draft-dujovne-6tisch-6top-sf0-01
which details the SF0 functionality and proposes a solution for a
chartered item.
Please respond by Friday to this mail indicating whether you
agree or not with this adoption, and preferably provide some
rationale to support your position.
The chairs will evaluate the consensus at the interim, and decide
whether the adoption is confirmed or the call needs to be prolonged.
Thanks in advance!
The chairs,
Pascal
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
