Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab) <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Yes, if it is v6 then hbh option -
    > 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brockners-inband-oam-transport-01#section-3.1

    > For Lijo’s use-case the below proposal was to define a new type in hbh 
option
    > defined here -
    > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brockners-inband-oam-data-01#section-3.3

1) make sure the option is set to be ignored if not understood.
2) when adding the option, an IPIP header is needed, so this will affect
   compression rates if an IPIP header isn't already required for another
   RPL artifact.


--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to