#45: details missing on error codes
Comment (by [email protected]): The proposal which reached consensus discussed at the 10/07/2016 interim is: - change RC_ERR to RC_ERR_RESET in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf- 6tisch-6top-protocol-02#section-4.3.3 - add a couple of lines on what RC_ERR_RESET means (error in state machine, something's really wrong) and what do when you receive it (consider transaction never happens). Per the worflow, please raise additional comment in the next 48h. If consensus, we will reassign issues to the editor. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-6tisch- [email protected] | [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: 6top-protocol | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6tisch/trac/ticket/45#comment:1> 6tisch <https://tools.ietf.org/6tisch/> IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
