#53: Timeout calculation
Comment (by [email protected]): Replying to [comment:2 diego.dujovne@…]: > I propose not to define a timeout until simulation/experimental > work provides results. For the time being, we are leaving the > timeout for the implementer, since 6P says the SF may (and not > must) define a timeout. On section 5.2, the 6P draft says: o MUST specify a value for the 6P Timeout, or a rule/equation to calculate it. But on section 4.1.1. the 6P draft says: Node A at the same time sets a timeout timer in order to cancel the transaction in case a response is not received after the timeout. The value of the timeout is out of the scope of this document and MAY be defined by the SF. More details are given in Section 4.3.8. -- ---------------------------------------+---------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: Diego Dujovne Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: 6top-sf0 | Version: Severity: Active WG Document | Resolution: Keywords: | ---------------------------------------+---------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6tisch/trac/ticket/53#comment:3> 6tisch <https://tools.ietf.org/6tisch/> IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
