Dale R. Worley writes: > I'm new here, but I notice that draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal mostly uses > "802.15.4" (39 instances) rather than "802.15.4e" (4 instances), even > though it applies only to TiSCH networks. Is this intended? What is > the best style?
The 802.15.4e is and addition to the 802.15.4-2011, and it got incorporated to the latest 802.15.4-2015 document. When it is using 802.15.4 that is refering to the latest version of the 802.15.4 + all approved amendments to it, i.e. currently 802.15.4-2015 + 802.15.4u-2016 - 802.15.4q-2016. Using 802.15.4e is like refering to the RFC that obsoleted with newer bis document, so it should not refer to the 4e unless it is talking about the history... -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
