Hi, I fixed this in our bitbucket repo. 6P "MUST"s SF to specify the timeout.
this update will be available in the next version of 6p including all the changes discussed during the IETF meeting. regards, Xavi 2016-11-17 2:14 GMT+01:00 Thomas Watteyne <[email protected]>: > Per Diego's presentation There is a contradiction on the 6P draft, first > saying that > the SF MAY define the timeout on section 4.1.1 and > then that the SF MUST define the timeout on section > 5.2 > > 6P authors, can you please fix? > > -- > _______________________________________ > > Thomas Watteyne, PhD > Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria > Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech > Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN > Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH > > www.thomaswatteyne.com > _______________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > >
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
