peter van der Stok <[email protected]> wrote: > My concern is with the number of protocols that the central authority has to > support.
I think the Registrar/JCE will need to support three protocols:
1) a push protocol over CoAP.
2) a pull protocol (RFC7030/EST).
3) a protocol to talk to the MASA (TBD)
> I understand that after the bad experience with CoMI, the 6tisch people do
> not want to be dalayed again by waiting for a common approach.
> Nevertheless, I think it is worthwhile to explore this avenue.
My impression, is that the CoMI work wasn't a bad experience, it was just too
complex to fit it into 15.4 Information Elements. I think some of the issue
was trying to automate the YANG->CoAP mapping. At least, that's what I
observed.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
